Blast from the past: Obama calls Sen. Barbara Boxer “a cutie” (Plus: update on how we can fight back)

Email This Post Email This Post

(cross-posted at Reclusive Leftist)

In the wake of sweetie-gate, someone emailed me this story from a year ago:

Obama, speaking at the Westin St. Francis in San Francisco, raised eyebrows Monday at a fundraiser for Sen. Barbara Boxer when, as we reported, the Illinois Senator described his Democratic colleague from California as “a fighter, a leader, a charmer, a cutie.”

The remark “set off a lot of murmuring,” said one Democratic strategist in attendance, “among a lot of very strong powerful women around Boxer there who were offended.”

The descriptive of a powerful feminist senator raised “a strategic question: is (Obama) ready for prime time? You don’t call a U.S. senator a ‘cutie,’” said the strategist, whose take was echoed by others.

Actually you do, if you’re Barack Obama. U.S. senators, journalists, pharmacists, factory workers – they’re all “sweeties” or “cuties” to Obama. As long as they’re female, that is. (Can you imagine him as President? Look out, Angela Merkel.)

What the hell is this man’s problem? He’s my age — mid-40s — and there is no excuse for this. He should know damn well not to talk to or about women in that manner. It reminds me of my first job back in 1980, when the male boss called all the women in the office “honey” and expected them to fetch him coffee. Workin’ 9 to 5…

But let me get back to that Boxer article from last year. Listen to this next bit (still quoting the unnamed strategist):

From an opposition research point of view, this marked “a swing and a miss” by Team Hillary: “It would have been easy to get the blogosphere and make sure Fox News and Drudge Report knew about (the quote), and watch it go .. because in a few months, nobody could have gotten away on it.”

The irony.

See, way back in February of 2007, people like me and that strategist and the women surrounding Sen. Boxer and probably the journalist who wrote that article — we all thought that something like publicly referring to a female senator as a “cutie” would be an automatic foul. We thought that public expressions of sexism would be frowned upon.

Thousands of Hillary Nutcrackers later, we know better. “Cutie” and “sweetie” are the least of it.

But the pushback is here. People are pissed. The premature coronation of Obama this past week — after Hillary won Indiana, after she won West Virginia in a blowout, when she’s sitting on the lead in the popular vote — was the last straw. Since the fat-cat politicians and pundits don’t give a good goddamn about sexism, we’ll just have to raise a stink ourselves. Just us chickens (and some enlightened roosters).

Cynthia Ruccia and Kimberly Myers went on Bill O’Reilly last night to explain why the treatment of Hillary is a deal-breaker for women and why they plan to leave the Democratic party in protest. The tubes have been burning up ever since with people trying to find out how they can contact Ruccia and help out. People have even been emailing me, and I didn’t know anything about it until this morning. HillBuzz has the name of the group and the contact info.

Steve Corbett is a radio host in Pennsylvania who apparently reached his own breaking point yesterday, and is now launching Operation Turndown to let the DNC know that we’re mad as hell and we’re not going to take it anymore!

Riverdaughter has a terrific round-up post this morning with more suggestions on what we can do right now make our voices heard: Friday: Fast II and Call to Action.

Spread the word!

Information and Links

Join the fray by commenting, tracking what others have to say, or linking to it from your blog.


Other Posts
From today’s postings 5/17/08
Women’s boycott of Obama percolates up to the mainstream media

Write a Comment

Take a moment to comment and tell us what you think. Some basic HTML is allowed for formatting.

You must be logged in to post a comment. Click here to login.

Reader Comments

This is a timely, incisive gathering of horrificially valid misogynist dirty laundry List–Barackophobia is setting in…

I have several GAY MALE friends. They all use the term “sweetie” and “cutie” with their boyfriends, girlfriends, mothers, fathers, and dogs and cats. Of course, Barack’s a sexist–his comment:

‘HER CLAWS ARE COMING OUT” and “SHE’S LIKEABLE ENOUGH!”…

But let us eliminate a more cheerful cause of His stutteringly neanderthal lexicon in view of my above statement perhaps, which in no way acts as an excuse for Him!

Again, folks, this is going off on a tangent when we need to be focussed. The DNC, the media and the Bush Admin are doing a full court press now to help Obama reach that 2026 mark so they can declare the race “officially” over.

This would be a huge psychological blow, which is why the Clinton’s team playing along with the bogus June 3rd date is inexplicable. They should have been insisting all along that a presumptive nominee can only be declared when there’s 2026 PLEDGED delegates (or 2210)- the supers have no place in this until the convention, when the first ballot is cast.

On top of that, the Howard Dean argument that the party needs more time to fight John McCain is equally bogus, since McCain himself may not emerge the G.O.P. presidential candidate in Sept. Conservatives are going to challenge him, likely with Karl Rove ready to field a much stronger ticket that will make short shrift of Obama. (Nobody they field, of course, can beat Clinton.)

Third point: If Sen. Clinton wants the superdelegates in her column, she has to show them that she’s willing to take on Pelosi and Reid, perhaps even replace them. That’s because every elected official is worried about reelection, and the party leadership has demonstrated that they can get someone unelected real fast if he or she crosses them. (Take for example, what happened to Chris Bell and Cynthia McKinney.) Clinton needs those supes, and therefore has to show she’s not kowtowing to the party brass. In this regard, declaring war on June 1st over the refusal to honor the Florida/Michigan results would be a good start.

(For an article I’ve posted on the manipulation of the election, click on my screen name.)